ideajae.blogg.se

1. #Icom 756 pro iii display types upgrade
2. #Icom 756 pro iii display types pro
3. #Icom 756 pro iii display types series

#Icom 756 pro iii display types pro

The 756 Pro III is expensive, but it delivers solid value. Your design engineers should be very proud. I also have two ratty ARC 5 Command Set rcvrs running. Where else can you find that combo for a similar price?īefore anyone flames me for being another know nothing newbie ham box buyer rather than a builder or tinkerer, I have an ARR 15 Navy surplus receiver working and an ART 13 AM xmtr project well underway. The addition of the spectrum display seals the deal. They are spending similar bucks on receivers when for the same or less money they could have an xcvr whose DSP rcvr is world class. In summary, the Pro III should get some serious attention from the high end SWL crowd. I sincerely doubt if it could be beat and those that tied it would likely be something costing five figures from Racal, WJ or some similar govt contractor mfr. In the meantime I'd put this Pro III up against any rcvr in a weak signal copy shootout. I have got to put up an antenna and try transmitting. They are not needed for good receive if you have enough wire out there in the "ether" interface. The two low noise preamps are awesome and allow the use of very small antennas. Sensitivity is as good as it gets given the noise floor. Add all these up and you can get good copy on a weak signal that would otherwise be wiped out by a strong adjacent signal. Auto notch works perfectly to get rid of heterodyne tones. The IF DSP does amazing things and essentially allows you to make custom filters. It appears to really be IF driven and not one of those cheap slow "scan and graphically log strength" imitations like you seen on scanners such as the AOR 8200. You can insatntly see what is on the air over a swath of spectrum. The panadator spectrum scope is soooo useful. The receiver blows the doors off my other receivers including Drake SW 8, Sony 2010, Hammarlund HQ 180, Ten Tec RX 320, Ten Tec RX 321, Ten Tec SP 325 etc, but it should have beaten them all given the price differential.

I actually think they should have considered a PRO III even if they never used the xmtr. I was an SWL for years before getting licensed and watched many SWLs spend big bucks on receivers. Since the power cord was unused in the original packaging, I wonder if it was ever powered up. It still had the plastic on the screen and not a single scratch or mark anywhere. The fates were looking kindly on me and I recently got a killer deal from my local ham store on a barely barely used indistinguishable from new Icom 756 Pro III for under $2K. Besides, I like buttons and dials, a lot.

#Icom 756 pro iii display types upgrade

I had been tempted by used Flex SDRs, but they would have required a major computer upgrade which would have taken me over my $2K limit. In my quest to get below 144 MHz, I had set a $2000 limit for my HF station. I'm sure the PROIII will surpass every expectation and will be in use for the next 10 years, hopefully trouble-free like it's predecessor. What more can I say that hasn't already been said previously!įor the time being I'm keeping the "Classic" - I'm loathed to part with it.

#Icom 756 pro iii display types series

In the end I decided to go with the Icom, not least for having a great experience with my IC-756 "Classic" but also the most excellent reviews this rig has received.īoy, has the IC-756 Series come a long way! I thought the "Classic" was great however, the PROIII is just streets ahead in virtually every department. My IC-756 "Classic" has given me 10 years trouble-free service without a hint of a problem with the monochrome display which so plagued this model however, I decided it was time to upgrade my HF/50MHz base.Īs with thousands of other amateurs I toiled to the point of distraction between the Yaesu FT-2000 and the IC-756PROIII. I currently have 2 IC-756's the IC-756 "Classic" and recently bought the IC-756PROIII. Yaesu FT2000-D (taken in exchange of 'IC 756 PRO III). Owned radios: Yaesu FT1000MP MkV (DX GUN!), Kenwood TS 870, Kenwood TS 850, Yaesu FT847 Yaesu FT 857D Īctually owned: IC751A, IC720A and. I cannot understand much success for a radio absolutely normal,but not a DX weapon, mechanically very sensitive.and with a high price (about 3.000 dollars!): maybe people remain enchanted by the monitor scope?. but the thing that I'm deeply disappointed is the transmitter: I found the timbre absolutely hitting, and quite depressing the lack power that you can pull out!

The front panel is simple to understand, but the knobs, including that of the VFO, seem more appropriate for a toy to a right transciever.

The receiver is silent, but nothing so special that I hear often speak from many OM owners. just put on the work, I could appreciate the beautiful display for its clarity in providing the information Two weeks ago I decided to sell my FT1000MP MkV and buy an IC 756 PRO III.